TheAK

Thank you for checking out this blog.  Below you will find formal argumentation which proves once and for all, that Atheism, is in fact, it's own religion . We will be using all standard definitions, and many different resources as to be fair, while remaining as neutral as possible. God bless. The REAL definition of Atheism: Atheism: The view that GOD does not exist. Atheist: A person that holds to the view that GOD does not exist. A person who maintains that there is no God. To get into this further watch these videos!!! http://youtu.be/GC89MrduK1c http://youtu.be/3QeGVwUPHBg http://youtu.be/d5Z1fpF7fhs The FAULTY definition of Atheism that many atheists use: Atheism: The lack of belief in God. The denial or disbelief that any god exists. Atheist: A person who chooses to deny or disbelieve a god exists. (A person who freely chooses to BELIEVE that NO god exists.) DONT Allow atheists to lie and use the faulty definition of their position. However, even if

[[THE SUICIDE ARGUMENT]]  Is a formal argument developed in late 2012 by well known Christian apologist Chad Elliott, better known as the AK or Atheist Killa. This argument got its name by proving atheism is in fact a self refuting position. Thus, atheism essentially kills itself without any effort from opposition.  In other words, Suicide!! It is also claimed by the author that this is not an argument for the Christian God, rather an argument to prove atheism an untenable position.  #Defeating atheism fun and Easy!!!       :The Formal Argument: P1- Atheists have to accept that all moral values are subjective. P2- If all moral values are subjective, then no action is objectively wrong. P3- If no action is objectively wrong, then abolishing atheism all together is not objectively wrong. P4- A position that makes you admit it's not objectively wrong to abolish it is self defeating  C- Atheism is self-defeating   [[Objective moral values]] - Objective moral

Welcome to ORA The OBJECTIVE REALITY ARGUMENT "Atheists have selected a position which robs them of the ability to identify truth. If you have to accept the 'possibility' that your thoughts may not be real (your own), and that you may not exist in a true objective reality, then you cannot know anything. It's logically absurd to assume any knowledge can be obtained if the before mentioned have to be accepted as possibilities." The Formal Argument: P1 : If you have to accept the possibility that you may not exist in a true objective reality,  then you have to accept that your thoughts may not be real. P2:  If you have to accept that your thoughts may not be real, then you rob yourself of the ability to identify truth. P3:  Atheists have to accept that  they may not exist in a true objective reality C:  Atheists rob themselves of the ability to identify truth. CONT... P1:  If you rob yourself of the ability to identify truth then you are intel